The report underlines that Turkey is continuing to improve its ability to take on the obligations of membership, but its administrative and enforcement capacities to cope with EU laws need to be strengthened.
The report emphasises the importance of the launch, in May 2012, of the new positive agenda aimed at putting the accession process back on track. The country's economic criteria are good but serious concerns are growing regarding Turkey's lack of substantial progress towards fully meeting the political criteria.
Although positive steps have been taken by Turkey in terms of participative work on a new Constitution and the establishment of an ombudsman, the Commission's report regrets the recurrent lack of consultation in the legislative process.
The improvements made by the third judicial reform package are highlighted, but the Commission deplores the wide application of the legal framework on terrorism and organised crime. This has been the cause of repeated infringements of the right to a fair trial and of the freedom of expression, assembly and association.
The Kurdish issue has yet to be solved, but, since the publication of the progress report, the so-called Imrali process has launched unexpected moves towards resolving the question.
The Commission regrets also that Turkey decided to freeze its relations with the Presidency of the Council throughout the Cypriot Presidency in the second half of 2012. Turkey's reaction...
In a press release issued after the publication of the 2012 progress report, Turkey's Ministry of Foreign Affairs insisted that the report was unbalanced, and focused on negative rather than positive elements.
For the first time during its candidacy, Turkey issued (in Turkish only) its own progress report, prepared under the coordination of the Ministry for EU Affairs.
This report can be considered as a reaction to the Commission's report, but also an indicator of Turkey's will for reforms.
Egemen Bağış, the Minister for European Union Affairs and Chief Negotiator, declared in a press statement that it was Turkey's response to the: "subjective, biased, groundless and narrow views" of the Commission's report. Less interest was evident on the part of Turkish newspapers to this year's report; most used headlines reporting critical statements, notably those of Bağış.